Sen. Mark Warner Discusses Election Security and Intelligence Oversight

Feb 08 2026

“Good morning and welcome to 'Face the Nation,'” Margaret Brennan greeted her audience, setting the stage for a critical discussion with Senator Mark Warner, the leading Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The conversation quickly turned to pressing issues surrounding election security.

Warner wasted no time addressing the FBI's recent actions in Fulton County, Georgia, where ballots and voting records from the 2020 presidential election were seized. “The Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was seen outside the elections office, claiming her presence was requested by the president,” he noted, raising eyebrows about the legitimacy of her involvement. “What justifies her presence there? Is there any foreign connection?”

“We have not been informed of any foreign nexus,” Warner asserted, emphasizing that the DNI's role is primarily focused on foreign threats, not domestic matters. He drew parallels to historical abuses of power, suggesting that Gabbard's actions could echo the Nixon era. “If the president asked her to intervene in a domestic investigation, it raises serious questions about his knowledge of the search warrant,” he added.

Brennan pressed further, asking if Congress had been informed about Gabbard's previous actions in Puerto Rico. “We learned about it through the press,” Warner replied, expressing frustration over the lack of communication from intelligence agencies.

“The irony is that many protections for our election system were established during Trump's presidency,” he continued. “Yet now, those very entities designed to safeguard our elections are being dismantled.” He pointed out that CISA and other agencies have faced significant budget cuts, undermining their effectiveness.

“Where is Chair Cotton on this?” Brennan inquired, seeking clarity on bipartisan concerns regarding election integrity. Warner responded that both parties have been working together to ensure updates on election security, but he remained skeptical about the current state of affairs.

“The potential for interference in the upcoming 2026 elections is real,” he warned. “Trump's obsession with Georgia and his comments about nationalizing elections raise alarms.” He highlighted the risks posed by ICE's involvement at polling stations, suggesting that their presence could deter voters.

As the conversation shifted to Gabbard's whistleblower complaint, Warner expressed concern over the handling of classified information. “The previous Inspector General deemed it credible, while the current one dismissed it,” he explained. “This contradiction raises significant issues about transparency and accountability.”

Brennan sought clarification on whether Warner would be able to access the underlying intelligence related to the complaint. “We are in the process of obtaining both redacted materials and original intelligence,” he stated, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation.

“Director Gabbard has faced criticism for her handling of this situation,” Warner remarked. “I believe she has not acted competently in her role.” He reiterated his concerns about her involvement in domestic investigations and the implications for national security.

Finally, as they touched upon Iran's nuclear ambitions, Warner acknowledged that while military actions had been effective, challenges remain. “Iran is attempting to rebuild its capabilities,” he noted. “Our ability to exert pressure is compromised by geopolitical distractions.”

“I support ongoing diplomatic efforts,” he concluded, signaling a cautious optimism amidst complex international dynamics. With that, Brennan wrapped up the segment, leaving viewers with lingering questions about the intersection of intelligence and electoral integrity.

What do you think?

👍 0
👎 0
🔥 0
😊 0
💩 0
😍 0
😤 0